We conducted a prospective randomized comparison of a cuffed graft (Venaflo
®) with a conventional polytetrafluoroethylene graft (Carboflo
®) with respect to the incidence of venous stenosis and patency. Sixty patients were assigned randomly to implantation with a Venaflo
® (Venaflo
® group) or Carboflo
® graft (Carboflo
® group). Mean age, gender distribution and diabetic and hypertensive status did not significantly differ between the two groups. At 6 and 12 months, primary patency rates were 42.6% and 29.0%, respectively, in the Venaflo
® group and 72.6% and 42.9%, respectively, in the Carboflo
® group. At 6, 12, and 18 months, secondary patency rates were 86.4%, 77.6%, and 77.6%, respectively, in the Venaflo
® group and 96.6%, 90.5%, and 84.1%, respectively, in the Carboflo
® group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in primary and secondary patency rates. Postoperative fistulogram performed 3 months postoperatively showed significant venous stenosis in 12 of 20 Venaflo
® grafts and in 11 of 21 Carboflo
® grafts. We conclude that the Venaflo
® does not have a favorable effect on primary and secondary patency rates or reduction of venous stenosis.
View full abstract