Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering
Online ISSN : 2424-0656
Print ISSN : 0570-4480
ISSN-L : 0570-4480
Search
Advanced search
OR
Browse
Search
Volume 44, Issue 4
JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR SAFETY ENGINEERING_2005_4
Displaying 1-12 of 12 articles from this issue
Show all abstracts
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
PROPOSAL FOR SAFETY
REVIEW
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Research to Make Out Intention of Risk Communications by Site Participation
    Koichi Saito and Katsutoshi Ohdo, Seiichiro Sakurai
    2005 Volume 44 Issue 4 Pages 241-249
    Published: August 15, 2005
    Released on J-STAGE: December 30, 2016
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18943/safety.44.4_241
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract

    The conventional Risk Communication is a well─known method for creating safety programs, and it is widely used for safety plans. We usually require a construction site to use a safety plan, but problems usually arise in the application of the conventional Risk Communication to the safety plan due to various factors such as the difference in constructers' perceptions of the cause of construction accidents. This paper describes an idea for the execution of a safety plan by introducing various perspectives, which are added to the background model of interest based on the empathic recognition with covering.The background models based on the empathic recognition with covering, which is defined by the difference in constructers' perceptions of Risk recognition, are explained on the basis of a machine learning method for ILP（Inductive Logic Programming）of classification learning. These models are assigned to each perspective. The safety plan can be determined even by an unskilled supervisor using the models obtained in this study.

    View full abstract
    Download PDF (467K)
  • A Study on Environmental Risk Cost Analysis
    Yukihito Shimamura and Shin’ichi Okamoto
    2005 Volume 44 Issue 4 Pages 250-256
    Published: August 15, 2005
    Released on J-STAGE: December 30, 2016
    DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18943/safety.44.4_250
    JOURNAL FREE ACCESS
    Show abstractHide abstract

    The purpose of this study is to examine corporate environmental risk management. This study will mainly focus on environment risk cost. It also contains a proposal for the introduction of a new framework. The principles of postponement─speculation in production and distribution systems entail two major aspects：“speculation” and “postponement.” In environmental risk cost decision making, these aspects correspond to “prevention” and “cleanup”. Similarly, “prevention costs” and “cleanup costs” determine the cost of environmental risk. Moreover, in environmental risk management, there are “control costs” and “financing costs.” These costs are also important factors in determining the cost of environmental risk. This study will express these relationships in terms of the new framework. It will also organize and examine corporate activities by the framework in order to make cost evaluations and standards of cost allocations easy to understand in terms of corporate environmental risk management.

    View full abstract
    Download PDF (298K)
TECHNICAL REPORT
SALOON
    • |<
    • <
    • 1
    • >
    • >|
feedback
 Top