Background: Recent guidelines for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) recommend prehospital administration of aspirin and nitroglycerin for ACS patients. However, there is no clear evidence to support this. We investigated the benefits and harms of prehospital administration of aspirin and nitroglycerin by non-physician healthcare professionals in patients with suspected ACS.

Methods and Results: We searched the PubMed database and used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Three retrospective studies for aspirin and 1 for nitroglycerin administered in the prehospital setting to patients with acute myocardial infarction were included. Prehospital aspirin administration was associated with significantly lower 30-day and 1-year mortality compared with aspirin administration after arrival at hospital, with odds ratios (OR) of 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI 0.36–0.62), respectively. Prehospital nitroglycerin administration was also associated with significantly lower 30-day and 1-year mortality compared with no prehospital administration (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.24–0.50] and 0.38 [95% CI 0.29–0.50], respectively). The certainty of evidence was very low in both systematic reviews.

Conclusions: Our systematic reviews suggest that prehospital administration of aspirin and nitroglycerin by non-physician healthcare professionals is beneficial for patients with suspected ACS, although the certainty of evidence is very low. Further investigation is needed to determine the benefit of the prehospital administration of these agents.

Background: Decompensated heart failure (DHF) can complicate catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). We investigated the association between heart rate and DHF in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation.

Methods and Results: In all, 1,004 consecutive patients who underwent initial ablation for AF (mean [±SD] age 68±10 years; 34% female; persistent AF n=513 [51%]) were enrolled in the study. Heart rate was assessed before and after ablation. DHF was defined as heart failure requiring medical therapy within 2 days after the procedure. The incidence of DHF was 2% (22 of 1,004 patients). Patients with DHF had a higher prevalence of a history of symptomatic heart failure (11/22 [50%] vs. 160/982 [16%]; P<0.0001) and a greater degree of heart rate decrease after the procedure (−21±29 vs. 2±21 beats/min; P=0.001) than those without DHF. On multivariate analysis, heart rate decrease was a significant independent predictor of DHF (hazard ratio 0.8; 95% confidence interval 0.7–0.9; P=0.004; 10 beats/min-increment).

Conclusions: In patients undergoing AF ablation, a decrease in heart rate after the procedure was an independent predictor of DHF.

Background: We previously reported the results of a questionnaire survey of 37 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) training facilities conducted during April 2020, in Japan.

Methods and Results: We conducted a second questionnaire survey in 38 CR training facilities to explore the preventive measures against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) after a nationwide state of emergency was declared and to investigate differences between the 2 surveys. No significant differences were observed, except for the requirement for patients to wear surgical masks during CR (P=0.01) in the second survey. Thirty-four facilities (89%) continued CR with innovations, 61% revised their instruction manuals (vs. 46% in the first survey), and, in 39%, patients requested resumption of ambulatory CR and training videos.

Conclusions: In the second survey, 74% of facilities were unable to continue conventional group ambulatory CR; however, patients maintained their physical activity and exercise regimens and managed their illnesses with the aid of telephones and mobile devices.

Background: As life expectancy rises, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is being performed more frequently, even in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study evaluated outcomes of elderly patients with AMI complicated by heart failure (AMIHF), as defined by Killip Class ≥2 at admission, who undergo PCI.

Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 185 patients with AMIHF aged ≥80 years (median age 85 years) who underwent PCI between 2009 and 2019. The median follow-up period was 572 days. The rates of in-hospital major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Type 3 or 5) and in-hospital all-cause mortality were 20.5% and 25.9%, respectively. The proportion of frail patients increased during hospitalization, from 40.6% at admission to 59.2% at discharge (P<0.01). The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 36.3% at 1 year and 44.1% at 2 years. After adjusting for confounders, advanced age, Killip Class 4, final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade <3, and longer door-to-balloon time were associated with higher mortality, whereas higher left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac rehabilitation were associated with lower mortality (all P<0.05). Progression of frailty during hospitalization was an independent risk factor for long-term mortality in hospital survivors (P<0.01).

Conclusions: The management of patients with AMIHF aged ≥80 years who undergo PCI remains challenging, with high rates of in-hospital major bleeding, frailty progression, and mortality.

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with occlusion of the left circumflex coronary artery (LCX) poses diagnostic problems that may lead to a delay in reperfusion.

Methods and Results: From a group of 1,269 consecutive patients with ACS, 138 patients with ACS due to LCX occlusion were analyzed for clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic presentations, as well as door-to-balloon (DTB) time. Electrocardiographic changes were classified into 4 patterns: ST-segment elevation in inferior/lateral leads (ST-E); ST-segment depression in V1–V4 (ST-D); no significant ST changes (No-ST); and others. The No-ST group was associated with a longer DTB time (P<0.0001) compared with the ST-E and ST-D groups. Compared with the No-ST and ST-E groups, the ST-D group presented with a more advanced Killip class (P=0.003), greater peak creatine phosphokinase (P=0.007) and peak creatine kinase-MB (P=0.006), more frequent proximal LCX occlusion (P=0.007), and worse 1-year outcomes (P=0.0034).

Conclusions: One-third of ACS patients with LCX occlusion showed no ST-segment changes, resulting in significantly longer DTB time. Improving diagnostic accuracy is challenging but critical to avoid delayed reperfusion in these patients without electrocardiographic changes.

Background: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) remain unclear.

Methods and Results: In this subanalysis of the J’xactly study, a multicenter prospective observational study, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with acute VTE according to unprovoked (n=388) or provoked (n=557) VTE status. Median follow-up was 21.2 months. Compared with patients in the provoked group, patients in the unprovoked group were younger, less likely to be female, and had higher body weight. The incidence of symptomatic VTE recurrence was significantly higher in the unprovoked than provoked VTE group (3.54% vs. 1.77% per patient-year; P=0.032). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major bleeding events between rivaroxaban-treated patients with unprovoked and provoked VTE (2.31% vs. 3.75% per patient-year; P=0.289). Although the proportion of patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m²who were non-users of antiplatelet agents was higher in the unprovoked VTE group, there was no interaction effect (BMI: 4.58% vs. 1.55% per patient-year [P=0.040; P for interaction=0.361]; concomitant antiplatelet agent non-users: 3.65% vs. 1.72% per patient-year [P=0.028; P for interaction=0.627]).

Conclusions: This subanalysis suggests the safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE. In such patients, DOAC discontinuation should be considered carefully, particularly in those not using antiplatelet agents and those with a high BMI.

Background: The association between heart rate (HR) reductions caused by ivabradine and left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain because of off-label use. Thus, the present study investigated the effect of HR reductions by ivabradine on LV diastolic function in HFpEF patients.

Methods and Results: This study enrolled 16 HFpEF patients with HR ≥75 beats/min. After 3 months administration of ivabradine, no significant changes were observed in mitral inflow E and mitral e’ annular velocities, B-type natriuretic peptide, or left atrial volume index, but there were significant improvements in global longitudinal strain.

Conclusions: Ivabradine did not improve LV diastolic function for HFpEF patients with HR ≥75 beats/min. Because this may be due to some study limitations, further studies should be conducted.