The Japan Journal of Coaching Studies
Online ISSN : 2434-0510
Print ISSN : 2185-1646
Original articles
Anthropometric characteristics and jump performance in national champion team volleyball players
Kenichi OkanoHikari NaitoSatoru Tanigawa
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2015 Volume 28 Issue 2 Pages 141-150

Details
Abstract

    The purpose of this research is to estimate the anthropometric characteristics and jump performance differences between professional and college volleyball players. Thirteen professional players group (TG) and twenty-eight college volleyball players group (NG) performed anthropometric (i.e., height, standing reach height, body mass) and performance tests (i.e., flexibility, squat jump [SJ], countermovement jump [CMJ], countermovement jump with arms [CMJA], repeated rebound jump [RJ], repeated rebound jump with arm [RJA], standing long jump, standing 3-steps jump and spike jump reach height with one step [SPJ1] and three steps [SPJ3]). RJ-index (RJ-index) was calculated by dividing the jumping height by the corresponding contact time (jumping height / contact time). Anthropometric and performance comparisons between college and professional players were accomplished by unpaired student’s t-tests. A criterion alpha level of p<0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.
    Height (187.2±6.8cm vs. 180.7±8.4cm: p<0.05), standing reach height (243.0±11.6cm vs. 232.3±12.8cm:p<0.05), and body mass (82.0±7.3kg vs. 73.9±5.3kg: p<0.001) were significantly higher in TG than NG. Flexibility (51.8±7.0cm vs. 53.4±11.4cm) was not significant difference between groups. While standing long jump (273.5±16.4cm vs. 261.8±18.4cm) was not significant difference between groups, standing 3-steps jump (793.4±60.2cm vs. 736.1± 45.7cm: p<0.01) was significantly higher in TG than NG. CMJ (50.2±4.9cm vs. 46.7±3.6cm: p<0.05), RJ-index (2.05 ±0.29 vs. 1.79±0.28: p<0.01) and RJA-index (2.40±0.35 vs. 2.07±0.45: p<0.05) were significantly higher in TG than NG. However, SJ (46.1±4.4cm vs. 43.9±3.8cm) and CMJA (60.3±6.9cm vs. 57.2±4.5cm) were not significant difference between groups. SPJ1 relative height (83.9±8.0cm vs. 72.3±7.1cm: p<0.001) and SPJ3 relative height (88.5 ±9.5cm vs. 80.4±8.7cm: p<0.05) in TG were significantly higher than NG.
    These results indicate that anthropometric and stretch-shortening cycle efficiency differences exist between groups.

Content from these authors
© 2015 The Japan Society of Coaching Studies
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top